Wine Country
By Noah May
Oct 11, 2024
I’m not sure there’s a winemaking region that’s as redolent of rustic glory and the swarthy largesse of the vine as the Langhe Hills in Piedmont. When you visit, it almost feels as if someone is having you on.
The terraced vineyards pan out around seemingly endless, winding roads. In the distance terracotta-clad hilltop villages offer the promise of aged nonnas, steaming brodos, and ancient aromatic delicacies, layered with the region’s prodigious bounties.
In autumn – the intuitive time to visit, in truffle season – the fog, la nebbia, of which the most notable grape variety, Nebbiolo, takes its name, falls down from the hills. It’s akin to a grey cashmere blanket, falling at silky speed, and lending even more mystery to the cobbled streets of these primeval villages.
Piedmont lies forty miles southeast of Turin in the province of Lombardy. This is a region that’s primarily known for three things – wine, white truffles and for those of a sartorial leaning, the great mills and weavers that have been situated around Lake Como for generations.
The wines of Piedmont are some of the most nuanced and age-worthy in Italy. The two most important of the region are Barolo and Barbaresco. Both these wines are crafted from 100% Nebbiolo grapes, and often produced in similar ways, although the specific qualities of village and vineyard can lead to markedly different wines.
Going back a generation these wines were, perhaps lazily, dubbed the King and Queen of Piedmont. Barolo was presented as the unreconstructed tannic beast - brutish in youth, but with the ability to take on regal aromatic complexity with time and patience. Barbaresco was typically softer in youth with a rounder fruit profile and more floral characteristics. The story went that Barbaresco needed less time to come around. These days, I think most would argue that these generalisations are reductive. Geography, the vagaries of weather and economics, and most importantly, winemaking intentions are what gives the wines most of their character.
For many decades the wines could be described as tough and cut out of a traditionalist mould. The grapes generally underwent extended macerations to provide a tannic structure which required decades of ageing in large, often ancient barrels called botti. This was the way fathers and grandfathers had made the wines, so why change?
The problem was that come the 1980s,with the arrival of Robert Parker and The Wine Advocate, these wines seemed stuffy and archaic to some; people wanted fruit and sheen. Enter the “Barolo Boys”, a group of young, innovative wine makers, keen to explore other ways of crafting Nebbiolo. Winemakers like Elio Altare, Luciano Sandrone, and Giorgio Rivetti brought in small, new oak Barriques (casks favoured in Bordeaux) and worked hard to reduce yields of the vines to encourage intensity of fruit flavour. The new oak gave the wine a vanilla-edged gloss and richesse, while shorter macerations meant the wines weren’t tough in youth and could be enjoyed with abandon.
The market absorbed these wines enthusiastically, and many forgot about the old styles. Some of the traditionalist estates were less-than-impressed. The late, great Barolo Mascarello, who once described himself as “The Last of the Mohicans”, was famously scathing of the trend, releasing an artist’s label of the 1999 Barolo, its label emblazoned with “No Barrique, No Berlusconi!” to express his disdain for both.
Critics of the new style felt that the true varietal character of Nebbiolo was being subsumed by a fashion that was affecting many wine making regions leading to an “International” style of wine, heavy in oak and fruit character, but lacking in nuance and the essence of the land.
Thirty years on, I’d suggest that both the modernists and traditionalists had a point. There has certainly been a return to classicism, with less new oak, and longer ageing in neutral vessels generally being the form. At the same time, wines still undergo shorter macerations, and are made in a way that promotes enjoyment in both youth and antiquity. Winemaking is generally much more precise and collaborative today. The great wine makers spend time in Burgundy, Champagne and Tuscany, learning from others, something which would have been unthinkable to bygone generations.
Two things remain undeniable, whether Trad or Modernist in leaning: Nebbiolo is a grape that ages beautifully, and it needs food to show its soulful depth. My following anecdote might provide colour to this hypothesis:
The greatest Nebbiolo I ever tasted was Gaja’s Barbaresco 1961. I was in Nassau in the Bahamas dining with a legendary collector. The wine was electric. A tar-stained, primordial beast, tempered by a graceful sense of ripe fruit, and pure varietal character. We opened the bottle late, as other diners shuffled off to bed. We ate cured horse meat, which our host had smuggled out of Lombardy. We laughed late into the blue hours of morning, giddy and alive. It’s a wine I’ll never forget.